Closed jonaslenz closed 4 years ago
@jonaslenz : Thanks very much for your submission as well as your clear explanation of some of the potential issues!
A key question will likely be that the software being wrapped is not open-source, as you have pointed out. I will discuss with the rest of the editorial team, and we may have some more questions and clarifications to ask of you.
In the mean time, you may also want to check the section on "scientific software wrappers" in the rOpenSci Packages book, as this has a note about this open-source/not open-source question and points to a couple of examples of exceptions.
@geanders : thank you very much for your response and the hint to the software wrapping section.
regarding this section, I wan't to give a hopefully helpful description of the wrapped software EROSION-3D:
:wave: @jonaslenz sorry for the delay and thanks for your answer. Because of the existence of open-source alternatives to EROSION-3D, ultimately we decided that your package is out-of-scope. Thanks again for your submission and good luck with further development!
Submitting Author: Jonas Lenz (@jonaslenz)
Repository: https://github.com/jonaslenz/toolbox.e3d
Scope
Please indicate which category or categories from our package fit policies this package falls under: (Please check an appropriate box below.:
Explain how and why the package falls under these categories (briefly, 1-2 sentences). Please note any areas you are unsure of:
scientific software wrappers The package allows users to reproducable run EROSION-3D from R, which is used up to now mainly through a GUI.
workflow automation A key feature of the package is the automated determination of calibration parameters, which is currently done in a tedious manual iteration process.
Users of EROSION-3D. Enchance reproducability, parameter determination for large datasets.
No.
Not applicable.
I want to ask if this package may be in scope. There are some potential issues and not all can be solved by me: