This idea was in response to a comment made by @hollybik when reviewing the F1000 taxa paper:
How does "taxa" deal with (or allow manipulation / correction of) taxonomic hierarchies with non-homologous taxonomic levels. For example, a set of input hierarchies where level 4 represents "Order" level in Fungi but "Subclass" level in protists. This is a very common scenario for metabarcoding datasets - ideally you want to introduce gaps/placeholders for hierarchies that do not contain a certain level, so that users can automatically or manually standardize their taxonomic levels all rows in a dataset (e.g. making Level 7 correspond to "Family" level across all taxa).
It would also be useful as an intermediate step when converting the taxonomy information in a taxmap or taxonomy object into a table with ranks as columns.
This idea was in response to a comment made by @hollybik when reviewing the F1000 taxa paper:
It would also be useful as an intermediate step when converting the taxonomy information in a
taxmap
ortaxonomy
object into a table with ranks as columns.