Open benmarwick opened 9 years ago
You could also take a look through mailing archives to estimate hostility quotients and the like for discussions, because that turns off new contributors (including women) and sets the tone for the whole project. Might get a bit personal, but could still be valuable; and could extend well beyond the R community in impact.
Yes, good idea, reminds me of @treycausey's interesting analysis of r-help:
http://badhessian.org/2013/04/has-r-help-gotten-meaner-over-time-and-what-does-mancur-olson-have-to-say-about-it/
I wonder if the ggplot2 mailing list might make a good comparison, because I think there are a few women that regularly answer questions there. And I think it is politer. I may be wrong.
From the little black box...
On Feb 28, 2015, at 10:27 AM, Ben Marwick notifications@github.com wrote:
Yes, good idea, reminds me of @treycausey's interesting analysis of r-help:
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
This is more of a data science project than a software development issue, but rOpenSci is notable for promoting gender equity, so it seems relevant. The goal would be to identify specific areas in the R user and developer communities to promote gender diversity and counter bias. The general approach would be to use the gender package to analyse various data sources on contributions to the R community to investigate patterns in proportions of female to male contributors. This is currently a topical issue, as we can see from a summary of recent conversations:
Here are a few specific questions that could be considered: