Release weatherOz 1.0.0

[adamhsparks]

First release:

• [x] usethis::use_cran_comments()
• [x] Update (aspirational) install instructions in README
• [x] Proofread Title: and Description:
• [x] Check that all exported functions have @return and @examples
• [x] Check that Authors@R: includes a copyright holder (role 'cph')
• [x] Check licensing of included files
• [x] Review https://github.com/DavisVaughan/extrachecks

Prepare for release:

• [x] urlchecker::url_check()
• [x] devtools::build_readme()
• [x] devtools::check(remote = TRUE, manual = TRUE)
• [x] devtools::check_win_devel()
• [x] rhub::check(), see https://github.com/ropensci/weatherOz/actions/runs/8748608983

Submit to CRAN:

• [ ] devtools::release()
• [ ] Approve email

Wait for CRAN...

• [ ] Accepted :tada:
• [ ] usethis::use_github_release()
• [ ] usethis::use_dev_version(push = TRUE)
• [ ] Tweet

[adamhsparks]

Setting up the release issue only, @bozaah.

Please do this when you get the time. My suggestion is get it accepted to CRAN and then we publish it in JOSS in that order so I've updated the paper branch so we can have a clean PR once this is all finalised.

[bozaah]

One issue I am unsure how we address is the urlchecker::url_check() and rhub::check() errors given the lack of https certificate in the Bureau website. Any ideas?

[adamhsparks]

yeah, I've had a discussion in the rOpenSci Slack Package Maintenance channel about this very topic that you can look at.

I'm of two minds. One is to just remove them as BOM could change the URL any day and we'd not be able to track it easily. The other is, BOM hasn't changed those URLs in years, so we can just include a note in the cran-comments.md to that effect that BOM won't allow headless access, but that we've verified they work and BOM is very unlikely to change the URLs.

[adamhsparks]

OK, I think it's really ready now. I've done all the checks, it passes everything as far as I can tell. I've included a note in cran-comments.md about the BOM URLs and updated all others that were reported as moved or incorrect.

I've submitted one last check to Winbuilder just to be sure.

[adamhsparks]

Seems passing winbuilder checks now. I think it's good to submit to CRAN now that the paper is accepted @bozaah