For #28, for which "metadata" is currently a list of two items: "dcmi" and "service," where the latter are the DCMI terms translated into service-specific format. #28 ultimately requires this to be restructured, so that "metadata" holds DCMI only, and serves as the single reference object for all metadata. The service-specific values can then be put in an additional client field ("metadata_service"), which is not printed.
For #28, for which "metadata" is currently a list of two items: "dcmi" and "service," where the latter are the DCMI terms translated into service-specific format. #28 ultimately requires this to be restructured, so that "metadata" holds DCMI only, and serves as the single reference object for all metadata. The service-specific values can then be put in an additional client field ("metadata_service"), which is not printed.