ropenscilabs / statistical-software-review

Experiments for rOpenSci's project for peer review of statistical software
1 stars 0 forks source link

(Testing for badges) - penguin submission #12

Open sckott opened 3 years ago

sckott commented 3 years ago

Submitting Author: Jane Doe (@janedoe) Repository: https://github.com/janedoe/penguin Version submitted: 1.04 Submission type: Stats Badge grade: gold Editor: TBD Reviewers: TBD

Archive: TBD Version accepted: TBD --- - Paste the full DESCRIPTION file inside a code block below: ``` Package: penguin Type: Package Title: Penguins Version: 0.1.4 Authors@R: person("Jane", "Doe", role = c("aut", "cre"), email = "jane.doe@gmail.com") BugReports: https://github.com/janedoe/penguin/issues Description: Provides .... License: MIT + file LICENSE ``` ## General Information - Who is the target audience and what are scientific applications of this package? - Paste your responses to our [*General Standard* **G1.1** here](https://ropenscilabs.github.io/statistical-software-review-book/standards.html#general-standards), describing whether your software is: - *The first implementation of a novel algorithm*; or - *The first implementation within* **R** *of an algorithm which has previously been implemented in other languages or contexts*; or - *An improvement on other implementations of similar algorithms in* **R**. Please include hyperlinked references to all other relevant software. - (If applicable) Does your package comply with our [guidance around *Ethics, Data Privacy and Human Subjects Research*](https://devguide.ropensci.org/policies.html#ethics-data-privacy-and-human-subjects-research)? ## Badging - What grade of badge are you aiming for? ([bronze, silver, gold](https://ropenscilabs.github.io/statistical-software-review-book/pkgdev.html#pkgdev-badges)) - If aiming for silver or gold, describe which of the [four aspects listed in the *Guide for Authors* chapter](https://ropenscilabs.github.io/statistical-software-review-book/pkgdev.html#pkgdev-silver) the package fulfils (at least one aspect for silver; three for gold) ## Technical checks Confirm each of the following by checking the box. - [x] I/we have read the [guide for authors](https://devguide.ropensci.org/guide-for-authors.html) and [rOpenSci packaging guide](https://devguide.ropensci.org/building.html). - [x] I/we have read the [*Statistical Software Peer Review* Guide for Authors](https://ropenscilabs.github.io/statistical-software-review-book/pkgdev.html). - [x] I/we have run [`autotest`](https://github.com/ropenscilabs/autotest) checks on the package, and ensured no tests fail. - [x] The [`srr_stats_pre_submit()` function](https://ropenscilabs.github.io/srr/reference/srr_stats_pre_submit.html) confirms this package may be submitted. This package: - [x] does not violate the Terms of Service of any service it interacts with. - [x] has a CRAN and OSI accepted license. - [x] contains a [README with instructions for installing the development version](https://ropensci.github.io/dev_guide/building.html#readme). ## Publication options - [x] Do you intend for this package to go on CRAN? - [x] Do you intend for this package to go on Bioconductor? ## Code of conduct - [x] I agree to abide by [rOpenSci's Code of Conduct](https://ropensci.github.io/dev_guide/policies.html#code-of-conduct) during the review process and in maintaining my package should it be accepted.