Closed maelle closed 2 years ago
Thanks for submitting to rOpenSci, our editors and @ropensci-review-bot will reply soon. Type @ropensci-review-bot help
for help.
:rocket:
The following problems were found in your submission template:
:wave:
@ropensci-review-bot assign @maelle as editor
Assigned! @maelle is now the editor
@ropensci-review-bot add @maelle to reviewers
@maelle added to the reviewers list. Review due date is 2022-03-04. Thanks @maelle for accepting to review! Please refer to our reviewer guide.
@maelle: If you haven't done so, please fill this form for us to update our reviewers records.
@ropensci-review-bot set due date for @maelle to 2032-01-01
Review due date for @maelle is now 01-January-2032
Reviewers:
Submitting Author Name: Maëlle Submitting Author Github Handle: !--author1-->@maelle<!--end-author1-- Repository: https://github.com/ropensci/riem Version submitted: Submission type: Standard Editor: !--editor-->@maelle<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: !--reviewers-list-->@maelle<!--end-reviewers-list--
Due date for @maelle: 2032-01-01Archive: TBD Version accepted: TBD Language: en
Scope
Please indicate which category or categories from our package fit policies this package falls under: (Please check an appropriate box below. If you are unsure, we suggest you make a pre-submission inquiry.):
Explain how and why the package falls under these categories (briefly, 1-2 sentences):
Who is the target audience and what are scientific applications of this package?
Are there other R packages that accomplish the same thing? If so, how does yours differ or meet our criteria for best-in-category?
(If applicable) Does your package comply with our guidance around Ethics, Data Privacy and Human Subjects Research?
If you made a pre-submission inquiry, please paste the link to the corresponding issue, forum post, or other discussion, or @tag the editor you contacted.
Explain reasons for any
pkgcheck
items which your package is unable to pass.Technical checks
Confirm each of the following by checking the box.
This package:
Publication options
[ ] Do you intend for this package to go on CRAN?
[ ] Do you intend for this package to go on Bioconductor?
[ ] Do you wish to submit an Applications Article about your package to Methods in Ecology and Evolution? If so:
MEE Options
- [ ] The package is novel and will be of interest to the broad readership of the journal. - [ ] The manuscript describing the package is no longer than 3000 words. - [ ] You intend to archive the code for the package in a long-term repository which meets the requirements of the journal (see [MEE's Policy on Publishing Code](http://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)2041-210X/journal-resources/policy-on-publishing-code.html)) - (*Scope: Do consider MEE's [Aims and Scope](http://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)2041-210X/aims-and-scope/read-full-aims-and-scope.html) for your manuscript. We make no guarantee that your manuscript will be within MEE scope.*) - (*Although not required, we strongly recommend having a full manuscript prepared when you submit here.*) - (*Please do not submit your package separately to Methods in Ecology and Evolution*)Code of conduct