As part of @arthurpsmith's reconciliation of APS affiliation data with ROR, NTT Communication Science Laboratories was exposed as a potential organization to be added to the registry. The existence of https://ror.org/01m2pas06 would argue if favor of its inclusion, but reviewing NTT's structure suggests a more holistic determination should be made about these laboratories. Specifically, they follow a hierarchy of NTT -> NTT R&D -> NTT Laboratory Group -> NTT Laboratory. See the "Laboratories" section of the NTT R&D site for details. What (if any) intermediate levels should be added to ROR? Similarly, if both organizations are in scope, this would suggest all would need to be added.
As part of @arthurpsmith's reconciliation of APS affiliation data with ROR, NTT Communication Science Laboratories was exposed as a potential organization to be added to the registry. The existence of https://ror.org/01m2pas06 would argue if favor of its inclusion, but reviewing NTT's structure suggests a more holistic determination should be made about these laboratories. Specifically, they follow a hierarchy of NTT -> NTT R&D -> NTT Laboratory Group -> NTT Laboratory. See the "Laboratories" section of the NTT R&D site for details. What (if any) intermediate levels should be added to ROR? Similarly, if both organizations are in scope, this would suggest all would need to be added.