ror-community / ror-updates

Central tracking for updates to ROR
56 stars 9 forks source link

Add a new organization to ROR: Borntouch Orthopaedic Clinic #9493

Closed ror-curator-bot closed 2 months ago

ror-curator-bot commented 8 months ago

Summary of request: Add a new organization to ROR

Name of organization: Borntouch Orthopaedic Clinic Website: http://borntouch.com Link to publications: doi.org/10.3390/life14010057 Organization type: Healthcare (A medical care facility such as hospital or clinic. Excludes medical schools, which should be categorized as “Education”) Wikipedia page: Wikidata ID: ISNI ID: GRID ID: Crossref Funder ID: Aliases: 본터치정형외과; Borntouch Clinic Labels: Acronym/abbreviation: Related organizations: City: Seoul Country: Republic of Korea Geonames ID: 1835848 Year established: How will a ROR ID for this organization be used? To identify affiliations for research publications

Other information about this request: Please add this institution at your registry

ror-curator-bot commented 8 months ago

Publication affiliation usage: Borntouch Orthopaedic Clinic: https://doi.org/10.5763/kjsm.2023.41.4.250, https://doi.org/10.5763/kjsm.2023.41.4.241 Potential aliases: Borntouch Orthopaedic Clinic Geonames match: Seoul | Geonames ID: 1835848

adambuttrick commented 8 months ago

All affiliation usage is limited and appears to be for a single author, but appears to have multiple staff. This may be fine to add, but I'd appreciate a second review.

arthurpsmith commented 8 months ago

Translation to English of the name appears shaky - in the DOI supplied in the request the clinic is named in the affiliation as "Bonetouch Orthopaedic Clinic" (i.e. "Bone" not "Born") ? That name makes a bit more sense for an orthopedics facility, on the other hand the English word "born" is all over the website. I can only find 3 total affiliation uses (the ones we have listed) all with the same individual, so I think this falls under our "use ORCID" response? But also could be persuaded otherwise here.

adambuttrick commented 8 months ago

Declining as lacking sufficient evidence of research outputs by multiple staff.