search

ros-controls / roadmap

54 stars 22 forks source link

Quality requirements for `ros2_control` packages #20

Open destogl opened 4 years ago

destogl commented 4 years ago

Hi,

working on ros2_control_demos package I found a few interesting stuff regarding the quality or ROS2 packages. I would like to document those here and we could use it to discuss what we would like to have in the short and long run. So I propose an initial list and hope for some feedback :)

List of quality requirement for ros2_control*-packages:

bmagyar commented 4 years ago

I've added this to the agenda for the next meeting

fkromer commented 4 years ago

Are you guys planning to consider IEC 62443 (Insutrial communication networks - IT security for networks and systems) and IEC 61131 (IEC61508 applied to PLCs) as well? It would be very optmistic to comply with them in the first place. But at least considering them could result in a high level design which would people help to migrate ros2_control to a certifiable solution. Equivalent to how Apex.AI did with their ROS2 fork for the automotive domain.

I'm pretty sure Víctor Mayoral Vilches from https://aliasrobotics.com would be interested in a project w.r.t. the IEC62443 part if not already iitiated.

destogl commented 4 years ago

HI @fkromer, thanks for the references. We are currently very working mostly on the basic structure to provide easier use than ros_control in ROS1. Nevertheless, this is a very good point. We will add this to our agenda for the next meeting and discuss it. Do you have any experince with this norms? Maybe you could joint the meeting and explain/present your ideas?

fkromer commented 4 years ago

Hi @destogl the IEC62443 part relates to https://discourse.ros.org/t/functional-safety-design-patterns/6364 and https://discourse.ros.org/t/functional-safety-design-packages/6451 cause IEC61443 builts on top of IEC61508. Despite of these hints I'm not able to give more info and invest more time. At work we are far from using a PLC ATM so I'm not allowed to invest more time into here.