New actuators often have additional motors, sensors and it is difficult to use ros_control without breaking the API for one joint.
It is following as much as possible JointStateInterface.
My C++ is rusty but I guess it would be possible to filter interface_name using Concept together with Template.
This is a request for comment.
This PR is one building block to exploit DynamicJointState (https://github.com/ros-controls/ros2_control/issues/89). The practical issues to be solved are the followings:
It is following as much as possible JointStateInterface. My C++ is rusty but I guess it would be possible to filter interface_name using Concept together with Template.