Closed Pranav186 closed 4 years ago
So this is a different robot from your other issues then?
In any case: please tell us how you start things.
Which .launch
files do you use? Show us the verbatim commands.
Yes, this is a different robot.
The command used was-
roslaunch motoman_driver robot_interface_streaming_yrc1000.launch robot_ip:=192.168.1.31
You shouldn't start that .launch
file directly.
Look at motoman_gp25_support/launch/robot_interface_streaming_gp25.launch and mimic that for your GP50.
Ideally you'd also create a support package for that GP50, so you have a place to store those files.
Finally: see whether Working With ROS-Industrial Robot Support Packages (linked from the main readme and the wiki pages) provides some insight into how robot support packages are structured, and why they contain the files they contain.
I'm going to close this, as it's a configuration issue, not an issue with the packages in this repository.
In the meantime: please keep commenting if you have any further questions.
If it turns out there is something which needs work related to this issue, we can re-open.
Look at motoman_gp25_support/launch/robot_interface_streaming_gp25.launch and mimic that for your GP50.
That worked, I am able to read the joint_states. Also, the robot is following the trajectory. Thanks @gavanderhoorn
Ideally you'd also create a support package for that GP50, so you have a place to store those files.
Finally: see whether Working With ROS-Industrial Robot Support Packages (linked from the main readme and the wiki pages) provides some insight into how robot support packages are structured, and why they contain the files they contain.
Yes, I will definitely look into that.
Hello, I am using the motoman gp50 robot with yrc1000 controller. After installing motosros, I am not able to read the joint_states. The command
rostopic echo joint_states
give the following output-Also, the terminal used for launching the file is giving the following error-
rosparam set controller_joint_names "[joint_s, joint_l, ..., joint_t]"
does not have any change.