Closed Hugal31 closed 1 year ago
Using the ur_description
package with ROS Noetic install on Windows breaks with this change. See output from command prompt below.
ROS Noetic on Windows 10 uses xacro v1.14.5. Would it be worth waiting with this change until relevant distros have upgraded to xacro v1.14.10?
C:\code\ros\thp_ws>roslaunch ur5_moveit_config demo.launch
... logging to C:\Users\jakob\.ros\log\1fc34124-3d4c-11ec-980c-c858c0f21b5a\roslaunch-Fairlight-4288.log
Checking log directory for disk usage. This may take a while.
Press Ctrl-C to interrupt
Done checking log file disk usage. Usage is <1GB.
name 'xacro' is not defined
when evaluating expression 'xacro.load_yaml(joint_limits_parameters_file)'
when evaluating expression 'config_joint_limit_parameters['joint_limits']'
when evaluating expression 'sec_limits['shoulder_pan']['min_position']'
when instantiating macro: read_model_data (C:\code\ros\thp_ws\src\universal_robot\ur_description/urdf/inc/ur_common.xacro)
instantiated from: ur_robot (C:\code\ros\thp_ws\src\universal_robot\ur_description/urdf/inc/ur_macro.xacro)
instantiated from: ur5_robot (C:\code\ros\thp_ws\src\universal_robot\ur_description/urdf/inc/ur5_macro.xacro)
in file: C:\code\ros\thp_ws\src\universal_robot\ur_description\urdf\ur5.xacro
RLException: while processing C:\code\ros\thp_ws\src\universal_robot\ur5_moveit_config\launch\move_group.launch:
while processing C:\code\ros\thp_ws\src\universal_robot\ur5_moveit_config\launch\planning_context.launch:
Invalid <param> tag: Cannot load command parameter [robot_description]: command [['xacro', 'C:\\code\\ros\\thp_ws\\src\\universal_robot\\ur_description\\urdf\\ur5.xacro']] returned with code [2].
Param xml is <param if="$(arg load_robot_description)" name="$(arg robot_description)" command="xacro '$(find ur_description)/urdf/ur5.xacro'"/>
The traceback for the exception was written to the log file
Yes, it is worth waiting for everyone to update.
I just checked on ROS melodic with xacro 1.13.17-1bionic.20220214.135922
where it also complains about load_yaml
. @jakobbak I don't really think this is a versioning problem?
This looks like it has been implemented in #602. Sorry @Hugal31 I didn't remember this one when creating it.
A direct call to the
load_yaml
function is deprecated. Use the namespaced variantxacro.load_yaml
.Otherwise, with xacro 1.14.10, we get