Closed gavanderhoorn closed 6 years ago
Ping
We will work on this during merging of PR #78, but we want to wait until #92 is merged (tests pending).
@Equanox @gavanderhoorn
Is it correct that the robot base coordinate system
is ${prefix}base_link
in our case?
yes, well, sort of. See ros-industrial/ros_industrial_issues#24 for some discussion.
The UR urdfs don't have the additional base
link yet (#95), which means that base_link
does not necessarily have the correct orientation wrt the real robot. Setting base_link
as the header.frame
link would then not work (I think).
@abubeck and @ipa-fmw should recognise this. See also this discussion on the ROS-Industrial mailing list about it.
I have seen some discussion with UR about this, but I don't know whether we have been able to resolve this yet.
@ipa-fxm wrote:
Is it correct that the
robot base coordinate system
is${prefix}base_link
in our case?
As #200 has been merged, we should now be able to consider ${prefix}_base
as the robot base coordinate system
.
ur_driver
is deprecated and will not see further development.
Closing.
The recently merged
WrenchStamped
publisher does not seem to initialise the header.frame field to any value. The scripting manual (v1.8, aug 2013) of the UR says:(sic).
If done on purpose (not setting the frame name), then this should probably be documented. Otherwise, the correct frame should be set by the publisher.