Closed 130s closed 7 years ago
Comment by corot Saturday Apr 20, 2013 at 03:19 GMT
Sorry for the junk commits; I tried to rebase but I'm terrible at git. You should take a loot at the min/max values I choose for parameters... not sure whether they make sense
Comment by sniekum Saturday Apr 20, 2013 at 16:57 GMT
Can you reduce the changes in this pull request to the minimal amount of things that directly implement the dynamic reconfigure stuff? There are extraneous commits (the 6 marker things and the revert) and there are also extra changes I don't want like spacing changes in the code and commenting out of status print statements. Please clean this up and resubmit the request if you can.
Issue by corot Saturday Apr 20, 2013 at 03:04 GMT _Originally opened as https://github.com/sniekum/ar_track_alvar/pull/6_
The enable/disable switch subscribes/unsubscribes to pointcloud topic, what at the same time stops the (also very CPU-hungry) depth image to pointcloud nodelet. When not subscribed, the lazy publishing of the pointcloud makes a huge saving on CPU.
_corot included the following code: https://github.com/sniekum/ar_track_alvar/pull/6/commits_