Closed Karsten1987 closed 4 years ago
@jacobperron pointed me to the answer.
Sorry for the noise.
I stumbled across the same problem. source-ros-binary-installation
should definitely be mentioned prominently in the README.md.
Thanks for this input - we've just put through this PR https://github.com/ros-tooling/action-ros-ci/pull/278 that makes it required to specify a target ROS distribution, and removes the confusingly-named source-ros-binary-installation
argument. Additionally I've just opened https://github.com/ros-tooling/action-ros-ci/pull/284 to update the README to mention it. With those changes do you think the situation is clearer? Any other feedback welcome.
Yes, the new inputs in https://github.com/ros-tooling/action-ros-ci/pull/278/ make it much clearer. Please note my comment on https://github.com/ros-tooling/action-ros-ci/pull/284/.
How can I use the current GH actions to run a binary job? If have the following configuration:
I can see that the desktop variant (foxy) is installed correctly, still yet the actual compilation fails due to - what looks to me - not sourcing the installed desktop variant beforehand:
What's the correct way of doing so and practically building an overlay workspace based on a binary distribution?
more info: https://github.com/ros2/rmw_iceoryx/pull/36