Open mikaelarguedas opened 7 years ago
I think the correct fix here is probably to use a different set of URDF files for the tests. Particularly, we should probably craft some URDF files that hit most of the lines of code in src/collada_urdf.cpp . Once we have those, we can remove the pr2_description files. However, this is a long-term fix.
If you are interested in doing a short-term fix, I'd be fine with copying the meshes here.
I think it's fine as is given that the test pass and to focus on the long-term solution of using a urdf in this package for testing purposes
pr2.urdf
reference meshes from thepr2_description
package but doesn't depend on it causing a lot of errors and warnings when running tests (extract of the error log below).Possible approaches:
pr2_description
. This will bury pr2_description deeper in the dependency list and move us away from removing it from thedesktop-full
dependency listIMO: The least amount of effort would be to copy the meshes while fixing the test output. A longer term solution could be to use a different urdf self-contained in this package or one of its existing dependencies.