Open m-naumann opened 5 years ago
Sorry I edited my comments as I didn't realize that this was modifying the proposal not the core messages. But the semantic meaning and clarity comments still hold as well as the location of the covariance documentation.
No worries. I tried to make my point in the code comments, but it's probably a matter of taste whether to start improving the naming but therefore mixing old and new, or whether to only improve naming for entirely new messages.
About the covariance: If there is another convention/documentation anywhere, let me know. That was the only one I found, and I changed it to separate treatment of single entries as that's at least in the automated driving context very useful.
EDIT:
as well as the location of the covariance documentation.
I agree, that's probably worth a PR to update the documentation of the three messages itself. Maybe you can shortly tell me whether I should prepare a PR for those 3.
Fix acceleration message
Keep the name twist for velocities
Add documentation for treatment of incomplete information