Closed luisenp closed 1 year ago
Oh, just noticed that this seems to be added in the ros branch. I was using melodic-devel
as reference, which is the link I get from pypi
. Was this the wrong place to look?
I have updated my code to match tag 1.2.1, which also includes LICENSE, so I'll close this issue.
Oh, just noticed that this seems to be added in the ros branch. I was using
melodic-devel
as reference, which is the link I get frompypi
. Was this the wrong place to look?
I think this is a valid point, melodic-devel is the default branch while latest tags are done on the ros2 branch, probably it would make sense to change the default branch?
Regarding the pypi package, note that it just contains a really old version of the package and as far as I know is not currently maintained.
I forgot to reference this related PR: https://github.com/ros/urdf_parser_py/pull/77 .
Regarding the pypi package, note that it just contains a really old version of the package and as far as I know is not currently maintained.
@traversaro this is good to know, thanks for the heads up!
Hi authors! We are currently using your package in Theseus. We are considering adding a local copy of
urdf_parser_py
to our third party folder as a fallback import for some use cases were we can't easily install from pip. However, we weren't sure if this was allowed by your license.From your package.xml it seems that you considered a BSD-license, however I don't see a LICENSE file in your repository. Could you include a file with the license type you are using?
Thanks!