Open CursedRock17 opened 2 months ago
Hmm looks like a regression with one test, do you think it needed to be patched in #374? I can't imagine changing to example_interfaces
would alter the time it takes to deliver one specific message, but I could be wrong.
@CursedRock17 https://github.com/ros2/examples/pull/374 is already included in your repo https://github.com/CursedRock17/examples/tree/deprecated_msgs? what do you mean by https://github.com/ros2/examples/pull/377#issuecomment-2086093785?
Yeah, I just didn't know if that specific test had passed all the way through, I'm trying to figure out why that specific test continues to be a regression. I guess it did pass in #374's CI so my changes must have broke it somehow.
Ok I understand it's the changes I've made that cause downstream CI failures, but I just don't see the correlation between this repo and something like rmw_implementation which is currently failing. Since neither repo includes each other I assumed it could've been test_msgs
but again there's no generation of examples. Could somebody point out what I'm missing when it comes to these failures? Thanks.
To be perfectly honest, I'm not entirely sure we should do this at all. I know we technically marked those messages as deprecated, but they are very heavily used; looking at the packages released into rolling, I see hundreds of uses of those messages. It just seems that they are too useful to be able to remove them.
Personally, I would actually be for reverting https://github.com/ros2/common_interfaces/pull/116 , and closing this PR and the associated issue. But we'll have to discuss that with the rest of the team.
Meant to resolve #356, this pull request switches all the deprecated instances of
std_msgs
toexample_interfaces
after deprecation of the many elements occured. Though, any msg withHeader
is still astd_msgs
since they were not part of that deprecation.