Closed csalzberger closed 2 years ago
Thanks for the report.
Would you mind opening a pull request to fix it?
Sorry, I've never worked with git before. Just wanted to let you know about the issue.
If I'm understanding the linked pull request correctly, you only fixed Duration.msg. The Time.msg file has the same issue.
Thanks I missed that it was both. I fixed it too.
Bug report
Required Info:
Steps to reproduce issue
The comments on the "nanosec" field for both Time and Duration message definitions says:
The nanoseconds field should be limited to 1e9 (1 billion), non-inclusive, not 10e9 (10 billion). Especially because the data type is uint32, which has a maximum value of about 4.3e9 (4.3 billion).
Expected behavior
Comment should say "1e9".
Actual behavior
Comment says "10e9".