Closed mauropasse closed 4 years ago
For issue 1, just read that: ..in order to enable a true zero copy data transport we have to limit ourselves to fixed size data structures. For issue 2, it looks more an issue of the performance framework than something related to rmw_iceoryx Closing this now
Regarding issue 1: This could be implemented quickly. There is already a unique ID in iceoryx. So far I had no ROS example where the compare guid was used. So I was wondering if this is currently needed.
For doing true zero-copy there is this fixed size data constraint. But if it is not fixed size rmw_iceoryx should serialize the data. So it does a copy but the goal is that all data types are supported
Hello, I took some time to run some ROS2 multi-process benchmarks with the iRobot performance framework using
rmw_iceoryx
and I run into a couple of issues. The idea is testing the shared memory capabilities for multi-processes runing in the same machine.The basic system is based on 2 processes: Process 1: Node 1:
Process 2: Node 2:
Where topic could be any message type.
Issue 1 When the "topic" is a
stamped_vector
message, I getSo the first question is, are you planning to implement the
rmw_compare_guids_equal
anytime soon?Issue 2 When the "topic" is other than
stamped_vector
message, I getI don't have any of this problems when using the other existing ROS2 middlewares
The topologies I used are: Issue 1 Process 1
Process 2
Issue 2
Process 1
Process 2
Thanks for your time!