Closed j-rivero closed 3 years ago
My first intention to change the code to implement that idea finished in a success build but before sending the PR I want to be sure that we want to go with it.
I don't understand the specific proposal but I don't see a reason why the definition of that struct couldn't be deduplicated. Please go ahead and propose a PR.
@j-rivero What is the status on this?
pull request is ready to review https://github.com/ros2/rosidl_typesupport/pull/81, just need some fixes in infrastructure to pass AFAIK.
Feature request
Feature description
The repository hosts a copy of the same file
type_support_map.h
in the two packages rosidl_typesupport_c and rosidl_typesupport_cpp. Not sure if that respond to a design decision or we could makerosidl_typesupport_cpp
to use the one inrosidl_typesupport_c
.My first intention to change the code to implement that idea finished in a success build but before sending the PR I want to be sure that we want to go with it.