Closed hidmic closed 3 years ago
Merging #262 (75e4005) into master (ac0795c) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
n/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #262 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 77.25% 77.25%
=======================================
Files 25 25
Lines 664 664
Branches 55 55
=======================================
Hits 513 513
Misses 131 131
Partials 20 20
Flag | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
unittests | 77.25% <ø> (ø) |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ac0795c...75e4005. Read the comment docs.
@ros-pull-request-builder retest this please.
Cool, thanks for the reviews! Does anybody have the bits to merge now? :sweat_smile:
@SidFaber If you get a chance, can you review/merge this?
@kyrofa or @mikaelarguedas can you merge?
How was it tested that this addresses the issue ? Can we confirm which test failure this is addressing ? which platform / architecture combination?
Looking at CI for this PR, it's not repeating any test so I'm not sure we can use that as reference to determine it reduces flakiness of a given test.
Comparing nightly CI referenced in the original issue: https://ci.ros2.org/view/nightly/job/nightly_osx_repeated/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/sros2.test.sros2.commands.security.verbs/test_generate_policy/test_generate_policy/ And the one after this was merged: https://ci.ros2.org/view/nightly/job/nightly_osx_repeated/2315/testReport/sros2.test.sros2.commands.security.verbs/test_generate_policy/test_generate_policy/
So maybe this PR did not have an effect ?
Replacement for #260. Only wait when daemon is in use (if not, CLI will use a different node).
CI up to
sros2
: