It is a better name than both the others. Specifying "?original" on the original file is a bit weird. As the ".do-not-convert" functionality does not block conversion, but only prevents replacement, it is a misleading name
PS:
I don't want to trigger regeneration of .htaccess files due for just this.
This means that in order to use the functionality, you must click "Save settings and force new .htaccess rules"
Why?
PS: I don't want to trigger regeneration of .htaccess files due for just this. This means that in order to use the functionality, you must click "Save settings and force new .htaccess rules"
504