Closed matt2000 closed 5 years ago
Hi @matt2000. I get these sorts of setup.py PRs to public stuff I have from time to time, but to be honest I lean towards not merging them as 99% of the time they end up breaking things in ways that confuse and hinder people that are just trying to use the libraries. For example if I try to install the package on my laptop using this branch I get the following:
(env)otter:requests-futures ross$ python setup.py install
error in requests-futures setup command: 'install_requires' must be a string or list of strings containing valid project/version requirement specifiers; Expected ',' or end-of-list in futures>=2.1.3; python_version<'3.2' at ; python_version<'3.2'
Obviously to you and me the fix is to pip instal -U setuptools
and try again, but that's not obvious to most people and they either open up an issue on the repo or just assume the library is crap. I'd happily look at a PR that tries to fix things in a way that works for Poetry that doesn't break the standard flow for most users. It's annoying that setuptools has chosen to take paths that break for old versions in ways that don't give random users that hit the problems any help figuring out what to do.
Replaced by https://github.com/ross/requests-futures/pull/79
PEP-508 recommends Environment markers for better compatibility with modern build tools and dependency managers such as Poetry.
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0508/#environment-markers
E.g., See also:
sdispater/poetry#844 sdispater/poetry#881