Consider adopting a code coverage service

rougeth / bottery

[DEVELOPMENT-HALTED] :battery: A bot framework with batteries included

MIT License

344 stars 51 forks source link

Consider adopting a code coverage service #53

Closed nicoddemus closed 7 years ago

nicoddemus commented 7 years ago

Given the recent issues about code coverage, it might be nice to adopt one of the available code coverage services that have GitHub integration. The advantage is that those services keep a code coverage record of each branch and post code coverage information in each PR. The two I know about are:

codecov: example of it in action
coveralls: example of it in action

Make sure to browse the links of the examples above to get an idea of what is provided by those services.

rougeth commented 7 years ago

I had codecov configured, but just noticed that Travis was returning an error when calling its command:

$ codecov
codecov: command not found

Already fixed on #54 Thanks @nicoddemus.