Closed Sk4zz closed 3 years ago
The fix broke something else. Now I replaced (> count 0)
by (> (lenght count) 0)
and that fixes the problem.
Your fix makes sense but now I wonder why I never had the same problem. count
is still a string in the test and I should not be able to compare it to a number. Can you confirm that any link with a limit leads to the same error ?
At least all the three links (100-500-9999) for the one entry led to the same error. I could try more, but looking at the code, I too wonder how it ever worked :)
Converting the limit argument into a numerical variable count earlier fixes issue #8.