search

roxrook / svg-android

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/svg-android
0 stars 0 forks source link

Patch for SVG enhancements #8

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Inkscape generates SVG output that is not processed properly by the library.
I have enhanced SVGParser.java to handle the following cases - If you are 
interested, I'm happy to (attempt to) send you the patch(es), or work with you
to get these features supported in the library
 - support transforms in <g> tags
 - support transform lists (e.g. transform="rotate(..) scale(..) ...")
 - support for arcs in paths
 - support implied commands in paths
 - limited support for text (e.g no tspan, but fill, stroke, transforms, etc
   seem to work OK

Original issue reported on code.google.com by suh...@google.com on 23 Jun 2011 at 7:51

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I would like your patch. Is it possible to attach it as a file here?

Original comment by mccor...@gmail.com on 11 Jul 2011 at 9:10

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I want the patch too! Or just release 1.2 already :)

Original comment by matti.ha...@gmail.com on 24 Jul 2011 at 4:00

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I have not been able to get a response from the project owners about this 
patch, 
so I am making it available at: http://code.google.com/p/svg-android-2/, 
although I'd
rather not have to create a separate project to do it.

Original comment by suh...@google.com on 31 Aug 2011 at 11:35

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I have a local branch which integrates some of the other patches posted here. 
If I make a diff containing those other patches would you merge it into your 
fork?

Original comment by mccor...@gmail.com on 1 Sep 2011 at 2:29

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Tried contacting project owners myself and no response. Can we start a more 
open branch somehow because the stagnation here is very frustrating.

Original comment by shaun.pu...@gmail.com on 1 Sep 2011 at 8:13

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
The fork is a good idea, can also be involved in that new project.

Original comment by jean.pou...@gmail.com on 1 Sep 2011 at 9:19

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I will try to integrate your patch - post it to the issues list.

Stephen

Original comment by suh...@google.com on 6 Sep 2011 at 4:03

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Bah, I just locally redeveloped this patch!

Original comment by eri...@teamworkgroup.com on 15 Sep 2011 at 3:30

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I want to thank you for the patch. The original SVGParser gave me a lot of 
headaches, but with your patch everything worked as suspected.

Many many thanks!

Original comment by lamarti....@gmail.com on 19 Mar 2012 at 10:57

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Shame, looks like the fork has gone stale too.  What are people using for SVGs 
on Android now?

Original comment by t...@vokware.com on 19 Apr 2012 at 10:34

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I'm still here - I've just been busy with other things lately.  
If someone is interested in stepping up and maintaining/fixing this, 
and as more time than I do right now - let me know - as I'm happy to
pass the baton

Original comment by suh...@google.com on 19 Apr 2012 at 3:35

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I am interested in keeping the project, for now I have enough time, and I'm 
also working on various Android applications that use this library. So am more 
interested in having it more maintained/fixed this library.

Original comment by turboch...@gmail.com on 23 Apr 2012 at 9:59

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I am once again trying to spark up interest in getting some of these patches 
merged.  I don't know that all of the patches currently in svg-android-2 make 
sense (I recently filed an issue regarding significant parser performance 
regressions here: http://code.google.com/p/svg-android-2/issues/detail?id=20), 
however after reviewing the complete patch set I'm confident that most of these 
are stable enough to include in this project.

Maintainers, please respond.

Original comment by jasta00@gmail.com on 2 Jul 2012 at 9:10

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I have refined these parser improvement patches and resubmitted them upstream 
under issue 35.  I have also been in communication with a member of this 
project that should help me get the merge through.

Original comment by jasta00@gmail.com on 13 Jul 2012 at 8:10