Open tischi opened 4 months ago
Hmmm, however for the latter I am now getting:
Explored 0 nodes (0 simplex iterations) in 0.02 seconds (0.00 work units)
Thread count was 1 (of 64 available processors)
I guess that means the watershed did not find anything?
Could you explain what one "node" is?
This node is from the gurobi solver output. Each node is a solution; it looks like your tracking problem is empty.
To debug I would check:
Is your detection map non-empty?
Are you setting the min_area
too high, thus removing all cells from the candidate hypothesis?
Is min_area
== min_volume
== min_num_pixels
for 3-D?
And how could I check the detection map? I see is the call segment(detection, edges, config, overwrite=True)
, but it does not seem to return anything?
Is
min_area
==min_volume
==min_num_pixels
for 3-D?
Yes.
And how could I check the detection map? I see is the call
segment(detection, edges, config, overwrite=True)
, but it does not seem to return anything?
segment
computes the possible partitions of the input detection
map.
It returns nothing because it stores these results in the database. Unfortunately, we don't have a tool to visualize this. We had one in the past, but it has not been updated. I'll open an issue for this.
If the final segmentation does not contain a lot of regions from your input detection, it means you're penalizing too much on the tracking_config.<appear, division, or disappear>_weights
, and you should bring them closer to zero.
@tischi I appreciate your questions; they highlight what needs to be improved. Don't refrain from asking.
I think the Otsu+EDT approach does not work very well for my new data:
I found in your code also this:
And I am wondering what that is? Is that simply a normalised gaussian blur?
In fact that is looking better I would say: