Closed lindsayad closed 5 years ago
You're certain this needs to be an implicit rather than explicit constructor? I'm tempted to agree but I've gotten myself in trouble that way before.
Hmm...this was motivated by some work I was doing in libMesh last week, and I think the work I was doing there could have used explicit. And I definitely agree that explicit
would eliminate some possible unintended consequences. I would be tempted to make it explicit
for now, and then see if I run into a use case later that requires implicit.
I would be tempted to make it explicit for now, and then see if I run into a use case later that requires implicit.
Let's try that? Thanks for indulging my paranoia.
I made the change to explicit...just squashed into the original commit
Thanks!
Needed for operations like: