Closed drboldwin closed 8 years ago
Pretty sure there's an issue for this already (multiple cambrinth), thought dedicated for cyclics gets weird. Is there ever a reason you'd want to use dedicated cyclic? Due to the decaying nature of links cambrinths with cyclics is kind of sub optimal once you have raw channeling, even if it double dips on efficent harnessing and efficient channeling.
Perhaps not - I would see a slight benefit when I run Rezz at 31-32 prep (it does significantly drain my attunement) but I don't know that the benefit would be worth the headache.
Looked into this more and don't see it happening. Closing.
so after working on allowing for some dedicated camb use I got to thinking. The main flaw with this is the fact that we only support 1 camb item. And so it really only allows for dedicated camb use to benefit using it as "spell" and not as "cyclic". I was thinking perhaps reworking camb items and doing something in your YAML along the lines of:
addressing the recharging and relinking of your cyclic camb with some flags ( I think there is messaging when you flag breaks, and know that you could at least grab the line that says you harness mana to maintain the spell or whatnot). Thoughts?