Open j-mracek opened 1 year ago
Why was this renamed from dnf-plugins-core
to dnf5-plugins
?
The rename broke the BOUT++ CI. Could a provides dnf-plugins-core
be provided?
Hi all,
personally it would be great if the following plugins were implemented as time allows it:
Thank you for consideration and all your work on DNF5 and migrating plugins!
Fedora CI also uses "repo-pkgs":
Unknown argument "repo-pkgs" for command "dnf5". Add "--help" for more information about the arguments.`
Is that a plugin as well? Or is there an alternative in dnf5?
Thanks!
Fedora CI also uses "repo-pkgs":
Unknown argument "repo-pkgs" for command "dnf5". Add "--help" for more information about the arguments.`
Is that a plugin as well? Or is there an alternative in dnf5?
Thanks!
In https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/635 it is mentioned that --repo
could be an alternative? The main difference is that if repo-pkgs
does dependency resolution it can use dependencies from other repos as well while --repo
limits to just the specified repo. So it depends on your use case. If you do install
/upgrade
it will probably not work for you.
Isn't copr
command already implemented? Or plugin would provide additional functionality?
Hello, I'm confused about this other plug-in ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919003) involved on an accepted change proposal for f41 (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPMCoW#Current_status)
Hello, I'm confused about this other plug-in ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919003) involved on an accepted change proposal for f41 (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPMCoW#Current_status)
This is something not maintained or developed by the dnf team.