Closed mmcco closed 6 years ago
I see.
Anyway, I'll leave it to you to use (void)arg
if you want to. IMO, that'd be a worthwhile simplification. It makes the code more readable, and compilers will probably start warning about that condition at some point (I'm considering attempting to write the warning logic for Clang in a couple weeks.)
In its current state, this condition doesn't make sense and will always be false. You probably meant to use the
||
operator.