Closed morr closed 9 years ago
@Wopian do you mean that instead of
A28149 #Nihon Animator Mihonichi
A3785 #Evangelion: 3.0 You Can (Not) Redo
A80 #Mobile Suit Gundam
it should be
A3785 #Evangelion: 3.0 You Can (Not) Redo
A80 #Mobile Suit Gundam
?
Because Gundam and Evangelion are definitely not the same franchise.
it should be
Pretty much. Because while Gundam and Eva themselves are completely different, the Nihon project has shorts from both franchises and should be relatable to both - which the original commit would've completely forbidden.
Waiting for @tehoko reaction before I pull anything
The problem is, Nihon
is a bridge between the two franchises. As far as I know, when our engine spots a common title in two separate franchises, it immediately groups them together, forming one franchise.
So if you want to keep Gundam
and Evangelion
separate, you have to cut the bridge in two places: Gundam-Nihon
and Nihon-Evangelion
. Although you could keep one of those bridges, cutting both ensures there's no unnecessary relations to crossovers like Nihon
. This is why the "bad group" has three elements, and it has to stay this way.
@tehoko added new commit with Gundam-Nihon
and Nihon-Evangelion
cut
@rr- @tehoko Btw maybe you would find my script useful to you. It builds with d3.js a graph with all franchise relations for specified anime (it takes into account all bans from merge requested banned-franchise-coupling.lst
).
How come shikimori.org's API uses the same anime IDs as MAL?
IMO this shouldn't be a bad relationship:
http://animatorexpo.com/evangelionanotherimpact/ http://animatorexpo.com/gensatsu_gundam/
The Gundam one is even by the original animators.