rrwick Basecalling-comparison issues

rrwick / Basecalling-comparison

A comparison of different Oxford Nanopore basecallers

GNU General Public License v3.0

313 stars 54 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

Clarification on `sloika_hdf5s` contents of "training data" dataset

#23 newalexander closed 1 year ago
1
Error while doing basecalling analysis

#22 singagan closed 2 years ago
0
Question on denovo assemblies vs reference based

#21 EugeneBragin opened 4 years ago
0
Test for the Chiron v0.5

#20 haotianteng opened 5 years ago
0
Running guppy on ecoli benchmark

#19 ardakdemir opened 5 years ago
2
Fix a typo in the README

#18 ExplodingCabbage opened 5 years ago
0
URL to biorxiv doesn't point to your manuscript.

#17 cerebis opened 5 years ago
1
Where does the read_data.tsv and id to fast5 file come from?

#16 callumparr opened 5 years ago
0
train guppie

#15 lfaino opened 5 years ago
0
FYI: new basecaller Flappie available

#14 alanlorenzetti closed 5 years ago
2
Granularity of the basecaller

#13 harisankar991 opened 5 years ago
0
BasecRAWller for basecalling

#12 sarah872 opened 6 years ago
0
Update Chiron reference

#11 mbhall88 opened 6 years ago
0
How to get Read ID and make a read-id-to-fast5 file?

#10 qianlou opened 6 years ago
1
nanopolish with homopolymer option

#9 johnomics opened 6 years ago
0
question about Nanopolish fasta extraction

#8 ma-diroma closed 6 years ago
2
platforms and hardware

#7 leila0210 closed 6 years ago
0
Combine with genechips?

#6 Nanoize closed 6 years ago
1
chiron 0.3?

#5 billytcl closed 6 years ago
1
suggestion

#4 conchoecia closed 6 years ago
1
Demultiplexed fast5s?

#3 nataliering closed 6 years ago
1
Connection refused for reference assembly

#2 cjw85 closed 6 years ago
2
Regression between Scrappie rgr_r94 and rgrgr_r94

#1 tmassingham-ont closed 6 years ago
7