issues
search
rrwick
/
Basecalling-comparison
A comparison of different Oxford Nanopore basecallers
GNU General Public License v3.0
313
stars
54
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
Clarification on `sloika_hdf5s` contents of "training data" dataset
#23
newalexander
closed
1 year ago
1
Error while doing basecalling analysis
#22
singagan
closed
2 years ago
0
Question on denovo assemblies vs reference based
#21
EugeneBragin
opened
4 years ago
0
Test for the Chiron v0.5
#20
haotianteng
opened
5 years ago
0
Running guppy on ecoli benchmark
#19
ardakdemir
opened
5 years ago
2
Fix a typo in the README
#18
ExplodingCabbage
opened
5 years ago
0
URL to biorxiv doesn't point to your manuscript.
#17
cerebis
opened
5 years ago
1
Where does the read_data.tsv and id to fast5 file come from?
#16
callumparr
opened
5 years ago
0
train guppie
#15
lfaino
opened
5 years ago
0
FYI: new basecaller Flappie available
#14
alanlorenzetti
closed
5 years ago
2
Granularity of the basecaller
#13
harisankar991
opened
5 years ago
0
BasecRAWller for basecalling
#12
sarah872
opened
6 years ago
0
Update Chiron reference
#11
mbhall88
opened
6 years ago
0
How to get Read ID and make a read-id-to-fast5 file?
#10
qianlou
opened
6 years ago
1
nanopolish with homopolymer option
#9
johnomics
opened
6 years ago
0
question about Nanopolish fasta extraction
#8
ma-diroma
closed
6 years ago
2
platforms and hardware
#7
leila0210
closed
6 years ago
0
Combine with genechips?
#6
Nanoize
closed
6 years ago
1
chiron 0.3?
#5
billytcl
closed
6 years ago
1
suggestion
#4
conchoecia
closed
6 years ago
1
Demultiplexed fast5s?
#3
nataliering
closed
6 years ago
1
Connection refused for reference assembly
#2
cjw85
closed
6 years ago
2
Regression between Scrappie rgr_r94 and rgrgr_r94
#1
tmassingham-ont
closed
6 years ago
7