# But when looking at actual reads, I found two parts. The first corresponds to one end
# of the provided sequences (through slightly different):
Was talking to John Tyson about this and he pointed out that the 1d^2 adapter contains a chemical modification which is what gives it affinity to the R9.5 pore so it looks like it is throwing the basecalling off here as you observe the reads don't match the documentation. As it is quite a long adapter it probably doesn't matter but just wanted to point it out.
Was talking to John Tyson about this and he pointed out that the 1d^2 adapter contains a chemical modification which is what gives it affinity to the R9.5 pore so it looks like it is throwing the basecalling off here as you observe the reads don't match the documentation. As it is quite a long adapter it probably doesn't matter but just wanted to point it out.