Closed DHekstra closed 9 months ago
I think --dmin=
will fix the issue, but probably we should look into this either way.
Yes, setting dmin to 1.73 resolved the problem. Somehow one reflection seems to have been included in the range of one dataset but not the other despite identical unit cell dimensions.
My guess is that this issue is to do with harmonic deconvolution and should be solved in v0.4.0. I'll have a look and respond with the conclusion.
Using the 90 frame HEWL files provided by @DHekstra, I was unable to replicate this issue with careless v0.3.8, v0.3.9, or v0.4.0.
this issue reproduces with --dmin=1.5
resolved by #146
For lysozyme anomalous data, we are performing a scan retaining the first 90, 180, 360, etc. frames and running Careless. We are taking the unmerged intensities, retaining only the reflections for the first N frames, and the friedelizing these into "plus" and "minus" reflections.
Here are example
rs.mtzdump
results:Note that the unit cells are the same. The highest res found in each file is also the same:
returns
Careless runs fine with reflections for 360 or more frames. With fewer frames, it fails with the following error:
FWIW, we will rerun with
--dmin=1.73
and report back.