search

rsalayo / OpeniT.Timesheet.Issues

This repository will host the issues ONLY for the original #TimesheetJS
0 stars 0 forks source link

Link to ticket numbers under Build Patch:<TEAM> should be linked to PAP instead of Redmine. #13

Closed rccoros closed 7 years ago

rccoros commented 7 years ago

Last April 3, 2017 I have an entry about updating patch 1491. I used Build Patch:GUI as the subprocess and used 1491 in the Task column. 1491 has a link but it redirects to redmine ticket 1491 instead to Patch 1491.

rsalayo commented 7 years ago

Thanks Master. Do you have an idea how we can put intelligence on this? Right now, depending on the process you chose. It will put an href based on the process.

Delivery: https://app.liquidplanner.com/space/75822/projects/show/ Development: http://redmine/issues/ Support: https://cerberus.openit.com/display.php?ticket= QA: https://patch.openit.com/patches/ Technical Presales and Analysis: https://cerberus.openit.com/display.php?ticket=

rccoros commented 7 years ago

I suppose we can use of the 1st digit of the SPID under Development. All 4-3x are Build-Patch:Team so any tasks with SPID like that can have the http://patch.openit.com/ as base link.

rsalayo commented 7 years ago

I thought creating a patch is still tied to a redmine? Should it be a redmine ticket instead? I'll think about it... ;-)

agvendiola commented 7 years ago

Maybe check what's newer with the two? The quick workaround this without too much effort is to let the user decide what link it will create, e.g. P1491 for patches, R7822 for redmine. The fallback without the first letter will be the intelligence you'll create.

rsalayo commented 7 years ago

I've decided I will add this now with conjunction to #30. Will be available when this issue closes from a commit. Though I won't be liable for XSS...

rsalayo commented 7 years ago

See teaser on #30

rsalayo commented 7 years ago

@rccoros, just touching base to see if you're able to take advantage of this functionality (#30).

rccoros commented 7 years ago

Yes! Thank you very much @rsalayo ! :+1: