Closed tschiemer closed 4 years ago
Yes, cases / deaths etc. per 100'000 would be also interesting. I will probably start with the international-numbers first.
What do you think?
As for resolving the number of infections/deaths relative to the overall population that is fine except for the missing overall population per country - which isn't necessary for that matter, but might be interesting numbers to have at hand. But as the goal is rather to show the spread of the virus in a simple way without too much info, that might be too much info ;)
But the death count I would also put it into direct relation with the number of infections, ie for Switzerland that would be 89 deaths per million residents which is ~3.5% of infections. This would give an indication of the differences by a country's general conditions and its methods of handling of virus.
Other statistics I've seen lately would show vast differences in deaths ranging from 2% upto 33% or so - but I guess there's also been data missing, for that matter.
Hmm ... because the countries / cantons don't test on the same level for me actually the most reliable number is still per capita (and unfortunately ... deaths per capita)
Hi, many thanks for setting this up!
What would be nice in most tables would be additional info giving a better impression of the situation instead of just the absolute numbers without context, thus also eliminating the need of manual comparison and other sources.
Such as: