search

rsc-ontologies / rsc-cmo

Chemical Methods Ontology
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
12 stars 7 forks source link

No license stated #3

Closed bjonnh closed 9 months ago

bjonnh commented 8 years ago

I'd like to use chmo, but no license has been stated.

batchelorc commented 8 years ago

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

bjonnh commented 8 years ago

Obo foundry updated (pull-request sent) with the license.

StroemPhi commented 2 years ago

can be closed, I guess

StroemPhi commented 9 months ago

see above 😉

batchelorc commented 9 months ago

Every time I try to find out how to actually update the .owl and .obo files with the licence information I get lost in a morass of semi-out-of-date documentation. Any idea what the right answer is?

StroemPhi commented 9 months ago

Ehm, I don't know what you mean. The license statement is alread in the OWL file:

<owl:Ontology rdf:about="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/chmo.owl">
        <owl:versionIRI rdf:resource="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/chmo/releases/2022-04-19/chmo.owl"/>
        <dc:description>CHMO, the chemical methods ontology, describes methods used to collect data in chemical experiments, such as mass spectrometry and electron microscopy prepare and separate material for further analysis, such as sample ionisation, chromatography, and electrophoresis synthesise materials, such as epitaxy and continuous vapour deposition It also describes the instruments used in these experiments, such as mass spectrometers and chromatography columns. It is intended to be complementary to the Ontology for Biomedical Investigations (OBI).</dc:description>
        <dc:title>Chemical Methods Ontology</dc:title>
        <terms:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
        <oboInOwl:hasOBOFormatVersion>1.2</oboInOwl:hasOBOFormatVersion>
        <oboInOwl:saved-by>batchelorc</oboInOwl:saved-by>
    </owl:Ontology>

as well as in the OBO file: https://github.com/rsc-ontologies/rsc-cmo/blob/master/chmo.obo#L8C93-L9C1

So this issue can just be closed ;)

batchelorc commented 9 months ago

Oops good point.