Closed StroemPhi closed 3 years ago
Dear @colinbatchelor, I'm sorry that I haven't had the time to comment earlier. Looking at this, I see that I forgot to mention in my initial proposal, that they merged the two terms in so far as that they took the rdfs:label from BFO_0000007 but used the ID BFO_0000015. The PURL http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000007 is no longer being resolved. So this needs to be changed, I'm afraid.
There is no 'processual entity' in BFO 2.0 anymore (see also https://github.com/BFO-ontology/BFO/issues/37).
Thus I propose to reflect this change in MOP as well, as this only means to pull up 'process' a level and make it the parent of 'process profile'. Just like it is done in RXNO.