Closed lategoodbye closed 3 years ago
I pushed a new version
Hello
We can definetly handle this as a new issue. I want to point out what I have seen, and what my opinions are.
I didn't notice this until I rebased my work onto your PR and ran the tests. There is some file that gives some output
When looking at the tests of this PR, https://github.com/rscada/libmbus/pull/168/checks?check_run_id=816071416
Lines 12-14 of the step "generate test frames" is new. There is no indication what file is causing this. (The level above probably just ignores it.)
mbus_vif_unit_normalize: Unknown VIF 0x07B
mbus_vib_unit_normalize: Error mbus_vif_unit_normalize
mbus_parse_variable_record: problem with mbus_vib_unit_normalize
Locally, I added this command echo "*** "$hexfile
at the loop at the end of generate-xml.sh.
It indicated:
*** test/test-frames/sen_pollutherm.hex
Looking at the diff, indicates that datarecord with id=2 is completly empty in the normalized file. The contents in the record with id=9, is how the normalized xml should look?
diff -u sen_pollutherm.xml sen_pollutherm.norm.xml | less
<DataRecord id="1">
<Function>Instantaneous value</Function>
<StorageNumber>0</StorageNumber>
- <Unit>Volume (1e-2 m^3)</Unit>
- <Value>799892</Value>
+ <Unit>m^3</Unit>
+ <Quantity>Volume</Quantity>
+ <Value>7998.920000</Value>
</DataRecord>
<DataRecord id="2">
- <Function>Instantaneous value</Function>
- <StorageNumber>0</StorageNumber>
- <Unit>Unknown (VIF=0x7B)</Unit>
- <Value>302</Value>
</DataRecord>
...
<DataRecord id="9">
<Function>More records follow</Function>
+ <StorageNumber>0</StorageNumber>
+ <Unit></Unit>
+ <Quantity></Quantity>
<Value></Value>
</DataRecord>
I would suggest two actions from this.
In order to increase the test coverage also generate the normalized version of XML output.