rsgalloway
commented
5 years ago HI, thanks for the report. You could use the -f format option to get this behavior, e.g.
$ lss -r tests/ -f "%h%r%t %R"
tests
├── test_pyseq.py
└── files
├── 012_vb_110_v001.1-10.png [1-10]
├── 012_vb_110_v002.1-10.png [1-10]
...But I see what you mean about the inconsistent behavior. The inconsistency is on these two lines:
https://github.com/rsgalloway/pyseq/blob/master/lss#L167 https://github.com/rsgalloway/pyseq/blob/master/lss#L174
Perhaps the reason the -r option does not use the global_format with %R, is for performance. That can be investigated. But, if we were to make these consistent, then the question becomes what should the default format be?
broganross
When running lss with the -r flag it doesn't show missing frames. Example: Running lss (no flags) in a folder with an image sequence with a missing frame you get this result (correct):
417 999_pep_001_comp_logc_v041.%04d.dpx [1001-1402, 1404-1418]If you run it in the parent directory with the -r flag you get this:
.└── 3840x2160└── 999_pep_001_comp_logc_v041.1001-1418.dpxWhile I would expect something like this:
.└── 3840x2160└── 999_pep_001_comp_logc_v041.%04d.dpx [1001-1402, 1404-1418]