Closed rolandjitsu closed 10 years ago
In ruby/rails world we often say "convention over configuration", this is why there is defaults (which I think are sane). If you don't like em, just configure yours.
That said, I think Sprocket does parse anything you put in /assets
if you prefer. Sprocket is the assets manager ship with rails but is compatible with any rack-base application.
@j15e The issue is that if I don't have those folders in the app/
(js
, css
, images
) folder, it won't start the app because it throws the error. Unless that is a bug, I really don't think it should set that for me, or at lease it should only do it if I don't provide new a configuration.
So that is what I am wondering, can I tell the extension not to set those defaults but to set whatever I told it in the
assets do
end
Otherwise it forces me to create those folders. And if we're talking convention, I often see folders like helpers
, controllers
, views
, etc. in the app
folder, not js
, css
or images
.
@j15e It seems that now it's working, without the default folders created. I'm not sure what the issue was.
It seems like the gem runs the
serve
on some default paths (inside theoptions.rb
file):That forces me to add the folders even though I have a different folder structure. Therefore if I don't have the folders I get an error that the folders do not exist and the app will not start.
I think it should not force devs to follow the same conventions, since we, most often, have a different folder structure depending the project.
Is there any way to stop it from doing that ?