Cielquan
commented
8 months ago Sounds good to me. JSONLines is also ok. But please make one PR per feature.
I guess both "languages" will need their own external parser. Please add them via extras like with yaml.
ml-evs
To Dos
[X] I have checked the issues and think that this is not a duplicate.
[X] I added a very descriptive title to this issue.
Description
We often want to annotate our JSON code blocks, e.g., in technical specifications like https://github.com/Materials-Consortia/OPTIMADE/blob/develop/optimade.rst.
We tend to do this by adding "
//" comments either on their own line or as inline comments, following the "standard" produced at https://komkom.github.io/jsonc.I think this would be straightforward to add as a
jsonclanguage to rstcheck-core and I would be happy to do the work. Is it of interest to the rstcheck devs/community?There should be no additional dependencies required, just a simple stripping of the comments before validating with the usual JSON validator.
We may also be able to follow-up with support for JSONLines if desired.
Operating System
Other
Operating System Details
No response
Python Version
N/A
rstcheck Version
N/A