It seems redundant but it does increase specificity, so that I cannot override the styling with, e.g.,
.shiny-notification {
opacity: 0.5;
}
i.e., this will make a blue box:
<div class="shiny-notification">This will be blue</div>
// css:
.shiny-notification.shiny-notification { background-color: blue; }
.shiny-notification { background-color: green; }
I couldn't find anything about the specificity of duplicate class names in the CSS selector specs and I wonder if all user agents interpret it in this way.
Session Info
─ Session info ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
setting value
version R version 4.3.1 (2023-06-16 ucrt)
os Windows 10 x64 (build 19045)
system x86_64, mingw32
ui RStudio
language (EN)
collate German_Germany.utf8
ctype German_Germany.utf8
tz Europe/Berlin
date 2024-08-02
rstudio 2023.12.1+402 Ocean Storm (desktop)
pandoc NA
─ Packages ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
! package * version date (UTC) lib source
P cachem 1.1.0 2024-05-16 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.3)
P cli 3.6.3 2024-06-21 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.3)
P devtools 2.4.5 2022-10-11 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.1)
P digest 0.6.36 2024-06-23 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.3)
P ellipsis 0.3.2 2021-04-29 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.1)
P fastmap 1.2.0 2024-05-15 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.3)
P fs 1.6.4 2024-04-25 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.3)
P glue 1.7.0 2024-01-09 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.3)
P htmltools 0.5.8.1 2024-04-04 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.3)
P htmlwidgets 1.6.4 2023-12-06 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.3)
P httpuv 1.6.15 2024-03-26 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.3)
P later 1.3.2 2023-12-06 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.3)
P lifecycle 1.0.4 2023-11-07 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.3)
P magrittr 2.0.3 2022-03-30 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.1)
P memoise 2.0.1 2021-11-26 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.1)
P mime 0.12 2021-09-28 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.0)
P miniUI 0.1.1.1 2018-05-18 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.1)
P pkgbuild 1.4.4 2024-03-17 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.3)
P pkgload 1.4.0 2024-06-28 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.3)
P profvis 0.3.8 2023-05-02 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.1)
P promises 1.3.0 2024-04-05 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.3)
P purrr 1.0.2 2023-08-10 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.1)
P R6 2.5.1 2021-08-19 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.1)
P Rcpp 1.0.13 2024-07-17 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.3)
P remotes 2.5.0 2024-03-17 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.3)
renv 1.0.7 2024-04-11 [1] CRAN (R 4.3.3)
P rlang 1.1.4 2024-06-04 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.3)
P rstudioapi 0.16.0 2024-03-24 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.3)
P sessioninfo 1.2.2 2021-12-06 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.1)
P shiny 1.9.0 2024-07-29 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.1)
P stringi 1.8.4 2024-05-06 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.3)
P stringr 1.5.1 2023-11-14 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.3)
P urlchecker 1.0.1 2021-11-30 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.1)
P usethis 3.0.0 2024-07-29 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.3)
P vctrs 0.6.5 2023-12-01 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.3)
P xtable 1.8-4 2019-04-21 [?] CRAN (R 4.3.1)
Describe the problem
The
toast_border_radius
Bootstrap variable documented here does not change the border radius of Toasts created withshiny::showNotification()
. Instead, thecard-border-radius
is used. The problem originates here: https://github.com/rstudio/bslib/blob/b2ecc63f1b70a6d3dda43430161bc7eb28c30752/inst/builtin/bs5/shiny/_rules.scss#L325Reproducible Example
related issue
On a related note: I'm also wondering whether the selector of that rule intentionally duplicates the classname. https://github.com/rstudio/bslib/blob/b2ecc63f1b70a6d3dda43430161bc7eb28c30752/inst/builtin/bs5/shiny/_rules.scss#L319
It seems redundant but it does increase specificity, so that I cannot override the styling with, e.g.,
i.e., this will make a blue box:
I couldn't find anything about the specificity of duplicate class names in the CSS selector specs and I wonder if all user agents interpret it in this way.
Session Info