Closed RLumSK closed 2 years ago
@nuest Sorry, I forgot to ping you for this PR.
@cderv The failed CI checks do not seem to be related to my PR.
Yes I agree. It seems to be from the Glossa format.
our test suites runs every format for now. It would be interesting to only test the modified format for PR 🤔
@cderv Thanks for the prompt response. For what it is worth, I have tested the modified version, only the Copernicus template, manually on my computer (macOS 11.6.1, pandoc 2.16.1, R 4.1.1). No problem here, but perhaps this is not a replacement for the full tests you run.
@cderv Thanks for your support and the critical PR review! You raised an important point I had overlooked, at least now we have tested that and I can keep an eye on it, in case it causes some problems in the future.
Another update of the Copernicus template (now version 6.4) and I've added a so far missing journal ("Web Ecology") to
copernicus_article()