Closed ei-ds closed 1 year ago
@ei-ds This is currently a limitation for {shinytest2}
. Since shiny server is run in a background R process (and not the current R process), it does not inherit all of the {covr}
initialization for reporting.
The unfortunate part is we can not reverse the execution processes and have the test code in the background and the app code in the foreground. Because of this, I do not see a way forward allowing {covr}
to report test coverage of a background R process to the foreground R process.
(Sorry to be the bearer of bad news!)
Closing for now as there are no plans to fix this situation within {shinytest2}
I'm coming from
{shinytest}
and have issues with code coverage reported by{covr}
when using{shiny}
modules.I prepared a simple test package with an app defined in
inst
as described in the documentation located here: https://github.com/ei-ds/testshinytest2. I modified the code to use{shiny}
modules. The app can be started withrunApp(system.file("hello", package = "testshinytest2"))
after installing the{testshinytest2}
package.Tests succeed without errors.
However, when running
covr::package_coverage()
the fileR/hello-world
is reported to be not covered by the test.With
{shinytest}
I followed the steps described in https://github.com/r-lib/covr/issues/277#issuecomment-555502769 and was able to get coverage reported correctly as well for{shiny}
modules.Are there any similar steps to do to get coverage reported correctly with
{shinytest2}
as well or is this feature not implemented, yet?