Open rneher opened 1 week ago
FWIW, autolin (with a minimum sample size of 10) finds seven sufficiently distinctive A.D.5.2 potential sublineages:
sublineage sampleCount mutations
A.D.5.2.X1 60 F:S377N,F:A107T,G:T238A,M2-2:I85V,P:K88R,NS1:L104I,G:T235I,L:A1927T
A.D.5.2.X2 30 G:F101L,G:H258Y,G:I235T,G:V225A,L:*2166Q,G:T235I,L:A1927T
A.D.5.2.X3 31 F:S105N,M2-1:R4K,F:V533I,L:T104A,L:T1927S,G:T235I,L:A1927T
A.D.5.2.X4 19 F:V379A,G:Y273H,L:A1787T,G:T235I,L:A1927T
A.D.5.2.X5 11 L:T1927A,F:I59V,F:N124T,G:S317F,L:*2166Q,G:T235I,L:A1927T
A.D.5.2.X6 16 G:Q140R,G:S283P,L:T1942I,N:I104V,P:E239D
A.D.5.2.X7 11 G:G232R,L:T104A,L:T1927S,G:T235I,L:A1927T
Here's what they look like in Auspice: Some of them are rather small with a lot of internal divergence and may not be worth it (should I use a larger minimum sample size?), and X4 looks like it died out in 2023.
A.D.5.2 is the dominant clade atm and has a few recognizable sublineages with mutations in F